By Maxim Olkhovskiy Deputy CFO – Commodity Trade Finance & Treasury.
Commodity shocks are usually explained through price changes. Prices for oil, gas, fertilizers and other commodities jump. Freight becomes expensive, insurance cost moves. Analysts start debating supply, demand, geopolitics and shipping routes.
Inside a physical commodity trading company, the shock becomes something more sophisticated—a real working capital stress test.
The same cargo may now require more financing. The same volume may consume more credit capacity. A documentation delay that looked manageable yesterday may become material today. A routine bank query may affect cash flow.
This is the part of commodity trading that is often under-discussed. Where the market sees volatility, finance sees the transmission mechanism.
Recent fertilizer disruption is a perfect example. Reuters reported that fertilizer shipments through the Strait of Hormuz had started recovering after months of disruption, but analysts still expected a slow return to normal flows. Yara’s July 17 results showed another side of the same problem: Higher nitrogen prices supported margins but hurt volumes, while operating cash flow fell because of inventory buildup and farmers delayed purchases.
For CFOs and treasury executives, the lesson is not only about fertilizer or any other commodity, but the way market shock moves through the financial structure of a trade.
The Same Cargo Becomes A Different Transaction
In physical commodity trading, volume and financial exposure are not the same thing.
A company may be moving the same tonnage as before. But if commodity prices, freight, insurance or financing costs rise, the economics of the transaction change. The letter of credit amount increases. Bank exposure increases. Working capital usage increases and liquidity buffers shrink. While the physical cargo has not changed, the financial weight of the cargo has.
And that distinction matters because finance capacity is not unlimited. The Asian Development Bank estimated that the global trade finance gap remained about $2.5 trillion in 2025. For a physical commodity trading business the practical question is narrower: Can this specific cargo be financed, documented and settled on this specific timeline, through specific banking routes without trapping liquidity?
Simple Example: Same Cargo, Different Balance Sheet
For example, a trader agrees to move 25,000 metric tons of product. Before the price shock, the product was priced at $340 per ton, and freight plus insurance adds another $35 per ton. The landed transaction value is approximately $9.4 million.
Now, assuming the physical volume remains unchanged, but the market moves, the product price rises to $550 per ton, and freight plus insurance increases to $70 per ton. The same 25,000 tons now represent a landed transaction value of approximately $15.5 million.
Nothing changed physically, but financially, it’s a different transaction.
If a company reserves 10% cash as liquidity buffer against such exposure, the liquidity tied up rises from about $940,000 to $1.55 million. If the buffer increases to 15% due to market volatility, liquidity requirement becomes approximately $2.3 million.
In these situations, if a document discrepancy, bank query or shipment issue delays settlement by 20 days, the larger problem becomes not only financing cost, but rather the fact that $15.5 million of credit capacity remains blocked, potentially preventing the next transaction.
The commercial team may still see the same cargo, while treasury sees a larger exposure, longer duration, lower certainty and scarcer bank capacity.
Four Channels Finance Leaders Should Watch
When markets move sharply, finance leaders should watch four channels:
• Exposure is the amount of capital tied to the transaction. If cargo value rises, the same physical shipment consumes more credit capacity.
• Duration is the time capital remains tied up. If documents are delayed, a bank asks additional questions or settlement moves by two weeks, the same trade becomes more expensive.
• Bankability is whether the transaction can still be processed by the banks involved. A deal may remain commercially attractive while becoming harder to finance.
• Certainty is the confidence that documents, payment, title, counterparties and settlement will align as expected.
A commodity shock becomes dangerous when all four move in the wrong direction at the same time.
When Documentation Becomes A Liquidity Issue
In many businesses, documents are described as paperwork, but in trade finance, they are closer to financial infrastructure. A contract, invoice, bill of lading, certificate of origin, inspection certificate, insurance document and letter of credit terms can determine whether cash moves on time. If those documents do not align, settlement may slow. If settlement slows, working capital remains trapped.
Digitalization can reduce friction, but it does not automatically solve the control problem. The ICC Digital Standards Initiative has noted that trade data often remains embedded in paper forms or PDFs, making the process slow, inefficient and prone to errors, inconsistencies and fraud.
That is undoubtedly a progress. But a digital document can still be wrong and an automated workflow can still move wrong information faster. The real question is whether the documents, parties, route, financing structure and payment terms all support the same transaction story.
CFO’s Early Warning Framework
Finance leaders should treat commodity price shocks as triggers for detailed transaction review. Here are five questions that matter before execution of any deal:
1. How much financing does the same cargo now require?
2. Can the bank still support this trade?
3. What happens if settlement gets delayed?
4. Do the documents fully support payment under the proposed deal structure?
5. Does this counterparty “fit” the transaction?
These questions will help determine whether margin becomes cash flow.
Final Thoughts
Treasury teams in physical commodity trading are no longer only the function that moves funds, but these are the people who help determine whether a deal can be executed, financed, documented, settled and reconciled.
Commodity price shocks will always be discussed as market events, but for finance executives, the deeper question is how a market event travels through the balance sheet. The companies that answer that question early will not avoid volatility, but they can protect against it, use credit capacity more intelligently and turn commercial opportunity into executable cash flow.
Forbes Finance Council is an invitation-only organization for executives in successful accounting, financial planning and wealth management firms. Do I qualify?
