The Oceania Times

Top Menu

  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Main Menu

  • Australian Economy
  • Brokers
  • Commodities
  • Currencies
  • Financial Market
  • Gold and Precious Metals
  • Investment
  • Stock Shares
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

logo

The Oceania Times

  • Australian Economy
  • Brokers
  • Commodities
  • Currencies
  • Financial Market
  • Gold and Precious Metals
  • Investment
  • Stock Shares
  • Asian shares fall as investors brace for inflation report

  • A-Mark Precious Metals (NASDAQ:AMRK) vs. Maison Luxe (OTCMKTS:MASN) Head-To-Head Comparison

  • Stock Market LIVE: Indices flat; Nifty below 17,500; IT, Media drag

  • The big change coming to Australian inflation after Reserve Bank governor Philip Lowe laughed at

  • South Korean won, Philippines peso lead losses among subdued Asian currencies

Financial Market
Home›Financial Market›Forces Opposed To Crypto In D.C. About To Make A Big Move?

Forces Opposed To Crypto In D.C. About To Make A Big Move?

By Megan
June 4, 2022
18
0
Share:

A faction of Washington, D.C. regulators is apparently considering a move to tighten the vice on digital assets that could – if implemented – perversely incentivize unregulated crypto activity in the U.S. This move by anti-crypto beltway forces seems intended to slow the growth of licensed crypto institutions in the U.S. and would raise many foundational questions. If enacted it would likely bolster the view of the U.S. as woefully slow in developing a cohesive and safe policy on crypto for the world’s largest financial market.

Here’s the move under consideration: D.C. bank regulators are considering adopting the SEC’s staff accounting bulletin for crypto custody in a manner that would apply it to every bank and – potentially – every non-bank crypto intermediary in the U.S. as well. If enacted, this could:

  1. significantly increase the capital requirement for U.S. crypto intermediaries, and
  2. in the worst-case scenario, render useless the licensing regime currently used by most U.S. crypto intermediaries – money transmitter licenses – because crypto assets are not “permissible investments” under the money transmission laws currently relied upon by most companies in the industry. If that happens, all 50 states could lose the fee revenue they currently collect from the crypto industry in the form of money-transmission licensing fees.

To be clear, nothing is yet certain and I have no first-hand knowledge of the plans. The topic has quietly been the “talk of the town” in Washington D.C. for the past few weeks, with crypto lobbyists and banking lawyers revving up. And, as with all things D.C. during an election year, some political types are privately expressing concern that an anti-crypto push ahead of the November election – one that goes well beyond a push for reasonable regulation – could backfire among millennial voters.

What Regulators Are Considering

The proposal under consideration builds on the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin 121, released on March 31, 2022, which requires SEC-reporting companies to account for crypto held by intermediaries for customer safeguarding as on-balance sheet assets and liabilities, rather than off-balance sheet. It penalizes the accounting for crypto custody relative to the accounting for securities custody. Building on the SEC’s move:

  • Federal bank regulators in D.C. are considering adopting a similar requirement for banks, according to the buzz in D.C. If they do so, crypto assets and liabilities under custody would presumably attract a capital requirement. Depending on each bank’s business and capital mix, the capital requirement could be 5% of crypto asset value or higher.
  • Next, if the federal bank regulators adopt the proposal, there is a real question whether it would also extend to the FFIEC (Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council). Apparently this is also under consideration – though, again, no one knows details. State financial services regulators follow FFIEC guidance when they regulate all of the financial institutions within their states (banks, trust companies and money transmitters) – which means all state-regulated entities could – again, could – then also be required to start reporting crypto custody as on-balance sheet assets and liabilities too.

Photo by studioEAST/Getty Images

Getty Images

Here are some implications:

First, the worst-case scenario, in which the FFIEC adopts the proposal too, could render money transmitter licenses inapplicable to crypto intermediaries. Would the crypto assets held for customers on-balance sheet be considered “investments”? If not, what then are they?? If investments, it may be illegal for money transmitters to hold the crypto assets because state money transmitter statutes generally permit money transmitters to invest only in safe, liquid assets like cash, T-bills and money market funds. This worst-case scenario would raise foundational questions about the licensing regime relied on by nearly all crypto intermediaries in the U.S.

Second, adoption of the proposal could massively increase the capital requirement for the crypto industry as a whole. Looking at U.S. industry in aggregate, crypto intermediaries today have almost no capital requirement – this is not unique, though, as the same is true of the fintech industry. Why? Because most fintechs and crypto intermediaries are licensed as money transmitters, and money transmission laws do not contain a prudential capital requirement; they instead focus on reserve requirements and the type of “permissible investments” for those reserves. A few crypto intermediaries and fintechs are currently licensed as trust companies, and trust companies do have a capital requirement but it is minimal compared to the capital requirement for banks. For example, in one instance, a trust company with roughly $30 billion of crypto assets under custody has only a $7 million minimum capital requirement today. Under the possible new rule, its capital requirement could spike to ~5% of assets under custody, or ~$1.5 billion. From $7 million to $1.5 billion – that would be quite a radical change indeed.

Connecting the dots: if the capital-light money transmitter licensing regime doesn’t work anymore, U.S. crypto intermediaries would need to become licensed as something else (i.e., banks, trust companies, broker/dealers, etc.) – and would become subject to far higher capital requirements. To cover the cost of that capital, they would need to charge customers more.

It’s also far from clear that the door is even open for crypto intermediaries to become licensed as banks, trust companies or broker/dealers, especially at the federal level.

Third, crypto custodians that also provide crypto lending services for custody clients could end up with a double capital charge under the possible new rule: one for the loan and another for the custody asset.

Fourth, U.S. GAAP currently treats crypto as “indefinite intangible assets.” This means the crypto custody assets moved onto the intermediary’s balance sheet will be carried at the lower of cost or market value (subject to impairment testing), while the liabilities will be carried at cost. This accounting mismatch is a recipe for earnings volatility at the crypto intermediary.

What Will Happen?

No one knows for sure, and this may all turn out to be a false alarm. But the SEC’s staff bulletin just appeared without warning – it was done in the form of a staff bulletin, which meant it was not subject to a notice and public comment process. Will federal bank regulators use a similar closed-door process? Again, no one knows.

Last Friday the banking and securities industry associations submitted a joint letter raising serious questions about the SEC’s staff bulletin – questions that should have been addressed before it was adopted, but there was no public comment process to identify these issues. Thankfully, when D.C. bank regulators have changed FFIEC guidance historically, they have normally done so via a notice and public comment process.

If the possible rule is enacted and the worst-case scenario actually happens, U.S. crypto companies would likely enlist their ~40 million U.S. customers to start lighting up Congress again, just as they did en masse in the summer of 2021 when the infrastructure bill included a proposal that was similarly serious.

Oh, and it’s an election year.

Source link

TagsBankingbitcoincryptoD.C.fintechmoney transmittersSECWashington
Previous Article

Here’s why Warren Buffett bought all the ...

Next Article

Financial Analysis: Bridge Investment Group (BRDG) vs. ...

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Megan

Related articles More from author

  • Currencies

    What are the different kinds of Bitcoin wallets

    August 1, 2022
    By Megan
  • Brokers

    New Motto exec’s tech key: focus on the user

    July 7, 2022
    By Megan
  • Financial Market

    Crypto here to stay and now is time to think long-term

    June 4, 2022
    By Megan
  • Currencies

    Crypto logical extension of fintech, its use as asset, currency a challenge

    July 22, 2022
    By Megan
  • Stock Shares

    Robinhood cutting about 23% of jobs, releases second quarter earnings

    August 2, 2022
    By Megan
  • Financial Market

    Cryptocurrencies Are Down, But Don’t Count Them Out

    June 25, 2022
    By Megan

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You may interested

  • Australian Economy

    In Asia, economy and security can’t be separated

  • Investment

    Weslaco’s impressive market share numbers helped guide our investment

  • Gold and Precious Metals

    Comparing Gold Reserve (GDRZF) & The Competition

  • LATEST REVIEWS

  • TOP REVIEWS

Timeline

  • August 10, 2022

    Asian shares fall as investors brace for inflation report

  • August 10, 2022

    A-Mark Precious Metals (NASDAQ:AMRK) vs. Maison Luxe (OTCMKTS:MASN) Head-To-Head Comparison

  • August 10, 2022

    Stock Market LIVE: Indices flat; Nifty below 17,500; IT, Media drag

  • August 10, 2022

    The big change coming to Australian inflation after Reserve Bank governor Philip Lowe laughed at

  • August 10, 2022

    South Korean won, Philippines peso lead losses among subdued Asian currencies

Best Reviews

Latest News

Stock Shares

Asian shares fall as investors brace for inflation report

People walk past a screen displaying the Hang Seng stock index outside Hong Kong Exchanges, in Hong Kong, China July 19, 2022. REUTERS/Lam Yik Register now for FREE unlimited access ...
  • A-Mark Precious Metals (NASDAQ:AMRK) vs. Maison Luxe (OTCMKTS:MASN) Head-To-Head Comparison

    By Megan
    August 10, 2022
  • Stock Market LIVE: Indices flat; Nifty below 17,500; IT, Media drag

    By Megan
    August 10, 2022
  • The big change coming to Australian inflation after Reserve Bank governor Philip Lowe laughed at

    By Megan
    August 10, 2022
  • South Korean won, Philippines peso lead losses among subdued Asian currencies

    By Megan
    August 10, 2022
  • Recent

  • Popular

  • Comments

  • Asian shares fall as investors brace for inflation report

    By Megan
    August 10, 2022
  • A-Mark Precious Metals (NASDAQ:AMRK) vs. Maison Luxe (OTCMKTS:MASN) Head-To-Head Comparison

    By Megan
    August 10, 2022
  • Stock Market LIVE: Indices flat; Nifty below 17,500; IT, Media drag

    By Megan
    August 10, 2022
  • The big change coming to Australian inflation after Reserve Bank governor Philip Lowe laughed at

    By Megan
    August 10, 2022
  • Asian shares fall as investors brace for inflation report

    By Megan
    August 10, 2022
  • Australian economy survived Covid better than most but recovery could slow, OECD says | Australian ...

    By Megan
    September 14, 2021
  • The Best Online Brokers, According to 5 Financial Experts

    By Megan
    September 14, 2021
  • Is Disaster Looming for Australia’s Economy?

    By Megan
    September 29, 2021

Trending News

  • Stock Shares

    Asian shares fall as investors brace for inflation report

    People walk past a screen displaying the Hang Seng stock index outside Hong Kong Exchanges, in Hong Kong, China July 19, 2022. REUTERS/Lam Yik Register now for FREE unlimited access ...
  • Gold and Precious Metals

    A-Mark Precious Metals (NASDAQ:AMRK) vs. Maison Luxe (OTCMKTS:MASN) Head-To-Head Comparison

    A-Mark Precious Metals (NASDAQ:AMRK – Get Rating) and Maison Luxe (OTCMKTS:MASN – Get Rating) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the ...
  • Stock Shares

    Stock Market LIVE: Indices flat; Nifty below 17,500; IT, Media drag

    Asian markets started on a negative note following a retreat in Wall Street. This was mostly due to the caution ahead of US inflation data that will shape nvestor expectations ...
  • Australian Economy

    The big change coming to Australian inflation after Reserve Bank governor Philip Lowe laughed at

    How Reserve Bank boss getting LAUGHED at on the world stage will radically change Australia’s economy The Australian Bureau of Statistics is trialing a new monthly inflation data series Reserve ...
  • Currencies

    South Korean won, Philippines peso lead losses among subdued Asian currencies

    BENGALURU (Aug 10): Most Asian currencies were subdued on Wednesday, while most stock markets in the region fell, tracking losses on Wall Street, as investors awaited US inflation data later ...
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
© Copyright The Oceania Times. All rights reserved.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Get our latest downloads and information first. Complete the form below to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.